blogspot visitor
Generally Recognized As True

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

For all the lip service we give to diversity, it really is important in pop music

In so many aspects of life, it is easy to see the value of diversity. Which is another way of saying it's often bad when everything is the same.

Does that make me homo-phobic? Or hetero-philic? It's never so clear. There's no room for black and white here.

But it's never as clear as it is in modern music.

Exhibit A: ABBA
ABBA would not have been possible without the diverse influences of its two male protagonists. It would also not have been possible without the incredibly tight harmonies offered by the simultaneously perfectly dissimilar voices yet perfectly similar voices of its two female singers.

They were a pop band with a sound that became increasingly synthesizer-driven as they moved (however briefly) through the late 1970s. Yet none of them started out making the music they became so well-known for. It was a perfect fusion of their folk/schlager influences riding on a current of disco music and rapid advancement in synthesizer technology. Even today, with decades of hindsight, very few people can make the music ABBA made.

They are responsible for one of the most perfect pop songs ever made -- "The Winner Takes It All" -- and it's a song that many bands would have been afraid to make. Nobody focused solely on the pop music of the time would have come up with the perfect bassline, which in isolation sounds like the accompaniment to a polka party or a high-brow Balkan pig-roast when you strip it back to what it really is.



And they combined their unnatural synthesizers with the natural tones of real bass guitar and real drums. I'm sure it was just a coincidence that it all started to fall apart when Benny decided to use a drum machine for "The Day Before You Came" (one of their very last singles):



Exhibit B: Death Metal
Death metal is one of the most boring genres of music ever. The music is monotone and the people aren't funny which combined with a difficulty in taking anyone involved seriously is a poor recipe for entertainment. Much of the same can be said of rap music, but death metal is somehow worse because it seems to pretend that it's more than it is.

...unless you're Opeth or Katatonia: two nominally death metal bands who have listened to far more than just death metal, so much so that they eventually concluded they didn't really want to do it anymore and wound up doing a very appealing sort of gothic jazz music (I'm not quite willing to call it "death jazz").

When you have broad influences, you can see how this:



...fits in perfectly next to this:



Exhibit C: Steven Wilson
I'm pretty sure he must listen to everything (including real life), and it shows. So many influences are evident, and all of them are built on toward something new with near-perfection:



"The Holy Drinker" apparently sounds quite random at first and takes some getting used to, but once you get inside its head, you can follow and remember every note:



He even masters the ABBA-style harmonies in a way very few other people can (the key, I think, is that the harmony has to be perfect, but the harmony is never the main point). Follow the progression that begins around 3:00 and ends near the 4-minute mark in "Deadwing", for example:



Diversity is important. Or, at least in music it is.




Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Sunday, July 07, 2013

More meaningful classified ads

Births, Deaths, Wedding Anniversaries, Graduations... where's the "Gainfully Employed" section?

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Only a matter of time...

I first saw this years ago and never really forgot about it.

Monday, February 18, 2013

Old person, come over here and teach my kids how to use technology

Kids wouldn't grow up knowing how to use technology unless they had a bunch of old people around to show them how it all works.

It sounds silly, but that seems to be the perpetual position of the public education system. I don't understand why it's not challenged more often, especially considering the expense of outfitting schools with "technology" and keeping it constantly upgraded.

There are some parallels between this and the notion of an undergraduate business administration degree. You come out of school with a business administration degree but no real business to administer when you get there. Business is something you wrap around a basic competence to make it saleable, not really a competence in itself. Professional management may have something to say about that, but I've never seen anything of quality come from an arrangement like that.

Likewise, kids have technology all covered. If you teach them nothing about it, they'll grow up somehow knowing how to use it because they have an interest and because it's now required to functional socially. But what they won't necessarily know about is how to do productive or useful things with it, and this seems to be a topic quite separate from use of the technology itself.

What would an old person more likely be able to help a child with? How to use a computer, or how to go about asking the right questions, thinking critically, and entering into meaningful experience?

It seems like schools could forever guide these timeless abilities without ever having a computer enter their classroom. It'd be cheaper, and probably more beneficial. The kids would figure out how to get it into the computer. It's more of a challenge for the old person.

Can it really be true that the reason such an "old-fashioned" idea fails to gain traction is that there's more effort involved, yet so little opportunity for graft?

Bygone days, indeed.

Everyone has opinions on education because everyone went to school at some point in their life, so that makes it even more surprising to me that the above idea doesn't have more currency.

Sunday, February 10, 2013

The raven that refused to sing

More and more, I'm finding that I can agree with certain new music but not with the way it's recorded, and not with how the life and blood is squeezed out of it by having all of the knobs turned up, the dynamics expunged, and all oxygen in the room consumed so that there's no space for anything else.

This is most apparent with the 80s revival currently taking place. It looks, moves, and sounds a lot like the 80s, but it doesn't feel like it. It's too close to your eardrums, and the space between the music and your eardrums is where feeling settles in (I assume illicit drugs can overcome this temporarily [see: techno music, clubbing]).

It's all just too loud.

Here's one that gets it right: